The reason why I think it is
important to talk about the films by Aparna Sen is simple: her films
and especially her recent films made in this decade are an impressive
demonstration what cinema is still capable of. Despite all obstacles
of our time, the fast moving public world of cinema, the lack of
diversity in the selection of the mayor festivals - her creativity
remains unbroken. That she has not got the recognition for her more
recent films is nothing less than a shameful injustice.
Her latest film Sonata
is for me another example why I consider Aparna Sen as one of the
most sophisticated film directors of our time – and not only in
India.
Sonata, a film
which Aparna Sen called a “chamber piece”) offers just in the
first 10 minutes more cinematic ideas and poetry than another
“chamber piece like for example Louis Malle´s My Dinner with
André in its full length.
The space where Sonata
takes place (a big apartment in Mumbai) is from the first shot a pure
cinematic space. The film is based on a play but it is an adaption
for cinema like only Aparna Sen is able to do in modern cinema.
Anywhere between Ozu, Dreyer or Hitchock´s finest “chamber piece”
Rear Window, Sonata stands for a another kind of pure
cinema.
How the two main
characters are placed in this apartment, how they move in it or how
they define or redefine it as their private space has indeed to do
with the virtuosity how people in their interiors are revealed in
films by John Ford or Yasujiro Ozu. How they claim their place in
Sonata in this place is often as well an analogy how they
define their place in the world. The apartment in Sonata has
it´s barriers from the world but as well openings through which it
is connected with it. The every day sounds from the streets are
invading this private room. Some windows appear like screens and they
are the visual pendant to the soundtrack. The inside and outside are
interfusing each other.
The dialogues between
Aruna (Aparna Sen) and Dolan (Shabana Azmi) are dealing at the
beginning with every day matters and often mutual bantering. It is
clear, this two women know each other for a long time. They share
this apartment for 25 years. They know each others weakness.
Sometimes they make jokes on the other´s cost about gaining too much
weight, about the sexuality of two unmarried women and it can be from
time to time as cruel like between the aging gentlemen in Ozu´s last
films.
How they move differently
in this apartment tells a lot about their relationship but as well
about their different characters. Dolan actually owns this apartment.
While Dolan is often walking around, sometimes even dancing, Aruna
prefers a certain place on her desk writing on her computer , framed
by big book shelves and her music collection. She is reserved, often
retrieved in herself. Dialogs and actions reveal something about
the characters but give also hints about what they hide. And even
when they try to banter each other, there remains a strange contrast
between elements of comedy and the awareness of vulnerability. We get
small ideas about their losses and fears.
But Aparna Sen also
introduces her characters in another way. We see often how they gaze
around, or how they gaze at others. What does it tell about us when
we gaze at the screen? What does it tell about the characters when
they gaze at each other or at other persons? Aparna Sen´s cinema is
always a cinema of glances. Once in this film, Dolan and Aruna are
looking out of the window into a neighbour´s apartment. There is a
lonely woman they have observed very often. They talk about the
strange woman´s loneliness with a certain distance but one feels
there is a connection between what they see and what they are. The
window is one of the many hidden imagined screens in Aparna Sen´s
films and these screens are often like mirrors
A third woman arrives for
a visit, Subadhra (Lillete Dubey), a journalist. She is a younger
woman and the only woman of this trio who is in a relationship.
Behind sun glasses she covers bruises - her violent boyfriend has
beaten her. Even though these are three distinguishable characters,
they also represent different options of a human life. They drink
wine and spend some time with laughter together. When Subadhra
finally leaves , there is an echo left on the two unmarried woman who
will question each others place in this world. A human life in a film
by Aparna Sen is often composed of different options by different
characters. It is a bit like with “the beings of time” in Marcel
Proust´s On the Search for the Lost Time. Life appears here
as a sum of an endless chain of decisions.
How explicit Aparna Sen
uses the designed apartment as a cinematic space is evident in many
aspects. This space changes often between the emphasis of the
illusion of spatial depth and the reminder of the flatness of the
film image. When the three woman are sitting on the couch, the space
is contracted. In another shot the space is extended in three
dimensions. Aparna Sen´s playfulness with revealing these limits and
options of cinema is one example for her formal richness.
In the first shot of the
film the space of this apartment seems clearly represented. It looks
easy to find one´s orientation. But after a few cuts and different
shots, we are nearly confused. There are doors which remain closed to
us and from different perspectives this apartment looks much more
complex than the opening shot suggests. How we define our orientation
in this piece of cinema, how Aruna and Dolan define and redefine
their place in the world is revealed in pure cinematic esthetics.
Only a few other
characters have short appearances, a friend Mira who has chosen a
female identity after a gender reassignment is only visible during a
skype-conversation and during a mysterious phone call. A drunken man
in front of their house and finally the former lover (Kalyan Ray) of
Aruna is visible in the only flashback in this film. There is a
strange contrast to the real time image of this skype conversation
and this engrossed image of a memory.
Sonata offers as
well one of the most sophisticated sound tracks in Aparna Sen´s
work. The interweaving of every day sounds in the apartment and the
street noise from the street separate and connect at the same time
the apartment with the world. The music score by Neel Dutt is another
aspect of this playfulness which reminds me in Ozu´s last films. We
remember when Aruna listens to Beethoven´s Moonlight Sonata. If I am
not mistaken it is after this moment when Dutt´s music begins. First
paraphrasing, later adapting certain moods in this film like for
example a frolic dance by Shabana Azmi. But sometimes the music
appears suspended in air between authorial music and a strange
mysterious melancholy which is hard to describe but which will be
confirmed at the tragic and disturbing end of the film. In contrast
to the characters, Dutt´s music seems to move independently from the
laws of time and space.
After all what I hear,
read and see, the conditions for cinema in India different from the
commercial Bollywood industry is not very convenient at all. That
applies for the the contemporary masters of this country as much like
for new talents, not to mention India´s disastrous handling of its
own film heritage. This is one reason more to consider each new film
by Aparna Sen as a precious gift to cinema.
Rüdiger Tomczak
No comments:
Post a Comment